View the PDF in your browser here.
March 2024 correspondence on meeting on S. 259, the superfund legislation.
View the PDF in your browser here.
Correspondence regarding ANR’s edits to S. 259.
View the PDF in your browser here.
Additional March 2024 correspondence regarding edits to s. 259.
View the PDF in your browser here.
Correspondence on redlines to S. 259 about harboring “the same concerns and caution” but don’t want to “get in the way” of bill sponsor Sears.
View the PDF in your browser here.
March 2024 ANR communications discussing the status of S.259, and that Justin Mankin would be testified on methodology “to assess costs from extreme heat, but has not yet been applied to other hazards like flooding or droughts.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
March 2024 correspondence on edits to S. 259
View the PDF in your browser here.
Emails between ANR Secretary and her Deputy expressing concerns about S.259, noting that it was making Moore “particularly anxious” and that “they haven’t done it before, it is theoretical at this point.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
View the PDF in your browser here.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In April 2024, ANR discusses meeting with individuals who research climate attribution.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In April 2024, ANR’s Climate Action Office circulates a memo on S.259, detailing the research and cost needed to implement the bill.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In April 2024, ANR Secretary forwards Vermont’s Treasurer details about the climate attribution used by Justin Mankin.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In late April 2024, ANR staffer discuss connecting with researcher Richard Heede to connect on a cost recovery formula.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In May 2024, ANR Secretary forwards information about S.259 to CLF’s Elena Mihaly.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In May 2024, Justin Mankin pushed back on whether or not attribution science was ready for Vermont.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In July 2024, ANR’s Secretary forwarded an RFI to Justin Mankin for his input on implementing Climate Superfund.
View the PDF in your browser here.
August 2024 email: “We’ll spread the word. And I’m looping in Elena from CLF here, as she’s leading on their ongoing work on Climate Superfund implementation”
View the PDF in your browser here.
In September 2024, Conservation Law Foundation requests a meeting with ANR about implementing Climate Superfund.
View the PDF in your browser here.
September 2024: “Did the Treasurer’s Office meet with CLF and others about the RFI? We were surprised to hear that and not be either included on the meeting or receive a summary. “
View the PDF in your browser here.
October 2024 correspondence for requesting the responses to the Act 122 RFI.
View the PDF in your browser here.
October 2024 correspondence on a meeting “re: Climate Superfund implementation support”
View the PDF in your browser here.
In October 2024, outside parties request a meeting regarding “climate superfund implementation support.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
November 2024 request on climate superfund implementation.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In December 2024, ANR’s Secretary requests talking points on “Make Big Oil Pay” for an interview, and the Climate Action Office confirms that climate attribution science “analysis has never been done for flooding.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
December 2024 correspondence on “ANR reaction to the RFI responses” on implementing the superfund law.
View the PDF in your browser here.
December 2024 correspondence on a “climate Superfund meeting.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
In December 2024, ANR submitted a member to the Treasurer’s Office to outline the workflow needed to implement Climate Superfund laws.
View the PDF in your browser here.
In January 2025, ANR prepared a “Climate Superfund Cost Recovery Program Report to the General Assembly.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
In May 2025, Conservation Law Foundation pushed back to ANR about receiving an RFP “addressing methods for assessing the costs of adaptation and resilience measures.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
April 2025: “Climate Superfund ‐ Additional Proposed Amendments”
View the PDF in your browser here.
In May 2025, outside parties request a meeting regarding “Act 122 implementation check in.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
March 2025 emails on the status of the “climate superfund request in House Approps.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
June 2025 correspondence on outside groups requesting a meeting to “debrief” on climate superfund post-session.
View the PDF in your browser here.
June 2025 correspondence on connections to “defend Vermont’s Climate Superfund law.”
View the PDF in your browser here.
